DZone
Thanks for visiting DZone today,
Edit Profile
  • Manage Email Subscriptions
  • How to Post to DZone
  • Article Submission Guidelines
Sign Out View Profile
  • Post an Article
  • Manage My Drafts
Over 2 million developers have joined DZone.
Log In / Join
Refcards Trend Reports
Events Video Library
Refcards
Trend Reports

Events

View Events Video Library

Zones

Culture and Methodologies Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks
Culture and Methodologies
Agile Career Development Methodologies Team Management
Data Engineering
AI/ML Big Data Data Databases IoT
Software Design and Architecture
Cloud Architecture Containers Integration Microservices Performance Security
Coding
Frameworks Java JavaScript Languages Tools
Testing, Deployment, and Maintenance
Deployment DevOps and CI/CD Maintenance Monitoring and Observability Testing, Tools, and Frameworks

Enterprise AI Trend Report: Gain insights on ethical AI, MLOps, generative AI, large language models, and much more.

2024 Cloud survey: Share your insights on microservices, containers, K8s, CI/CD, and DevOps (+ enter a $750 raffle!) for our Trend Reports.

PostgreSQL: Learn about the open-source RDBMS' advanced capabilities, core components, common commands and functions, and general DBA tasks.

AI Automation Essentials. Check out the latest Refcard on all things AI automation, including model training, data security, and more.

Related

  • The Naming Nuance of Non-Functional Requirements
  • Automated Functional Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide
  • How To Test for Your Software’s Scalability
  • Implementing DDoS With MuleSoft: Demonstration With Apache JMeter

Trending

  • Long Tests: Saving All App’s Debug Logs and Writing Your Own Logs
  • AI and Rules for Agile Microservices in Minutes
  • Harmonizing AI: Crafting Personalized Song Suggestions
  • Deploying to Heroku With GitLab CI/CD
  1. DZone
  2. Software Design and Architecture
  3. Performance
  4. Understanding the Power of Coefficient of Variation in Software Performance Testing

Understanding the Power of Coefficient of Variation in Software Performance Testing

How to use the Coefficient of Variation (CoV) metric in the analysis of your test results and how JMeter reports this statistic.

By 
Robert Bourgault user avatar
Robert Bourgault
·
Oct. 09, 23 · Tutorial
Like (1)
Save
Tweet
Share
2.1K Views

Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.

Join For Free

Oh no! Not another figure to look at when analyzing performance test results! Most performance tools already report a bunch of them (e.g., average, min, max, percentiles...), which we have to review for our report; why add a new metric to the list?

Actually, the Coefficient of Variation (CoV) stands out as a valuable metric to prove that your application will perform reliably under various conditions. In this article, we will explore the benefits and usage of the CoV in software performance testing, specifically when measuring response times, and look at how it is reported in Apache JMeter.

What Is the Coefficient of Variation?

The Coefficient of Variation is a statistical measure used to assess the relative variability of data points in relation to their mean. In other words, it quantifies the consistency or stability of the dataset. It is expressed as a percentage and is calculated as:

CoV = (Standard Deviation / Mean) x 100

In the context of software performance testing, the CoV can provide invaluable insights into the stability of the response times. Let's see how.

Benefits of Using the Coefficient of Variation in Software Performance Testing

Detecting Variability

Response times in software applications can vary significantly due to a range of factors, including server load, network conditions, and code efficiency. The CoV helps in detecting if these response times are consistently stable or if they fluctuate widely. High CoV values indicate instability, while low CoV values suggest consistency.

The following figure shows two examples of samplers with a moderate CoV value of 20.66% and a high CoV value of 49.90%:

With the HighCov sampler, we can see that the response time is constantly bouncing between 50 to 600ms (not good), whereas the response times of the ModerateCov sampler vary between 50 to 100ms (acceptable).

Comparing Different Test Scenarios or Different Versions of the App

If you have to run the same tests under different conditions, such as various loads, hardware configurations, or app versions, then by analyzing the CoV of each scenario, you can easily compare their response time stability. This helps identify scenarios and/or versions where the application may struggle to maintain consistent performance.

Reporting of the CoV in JMeter

The Standard Deviation and Average values are already given in the Summary Report of JMeter. Then, you can manually calculate the CoV following the formulae given above with these values.

However, two new plugins, the Apdex and Coefficient of Variation and the Cohen's d Results Comparison plugins, will compute the CoV directly for you. The CoV values in the Apdex and CoV plugins will help you detect variability in the current application, whereas the CoV values in the Results Comparison plugin will help you compare the CoV of two different tests.

Setting CoV Pass/Fail Criteria

Furthermore, the Apdex and CoV plugin lets you define a maximum acceptable CoV threshold to ensure that the response times remain within an acceptable level of variability. If the CoV exceeds this threshold, it may indicate performance issues, and the test shall be marked as "failed."

When the CoV exceeds the acceptable threshold, it serves as an early warning sign that something may be wrong. You would then need to delve deeper to identify the root causes of the performance issues. This proactive approach to troubleshooting can save time and resources down the track.

Keep in mind that the CoV's significance depends on the context. A high CoV might be acceptable during a peak test but not during normal tests.

Specifying the Criteria for CoV Pass/Fail Testing

The specific value for pass/fail testing using the CoV can vary depending on the nature of the application and the expectations of its users. However, here are some general guidelines to consider:

  • Establish a Baseline: Start by establishing a baseline CoV value during normal operating conditions. This can help you set realistic thresholds and can serve as a reference point for future testing.
  • Define an Acceptable Range: as a starting point, the following table provides a general indication of what might be considered low, moderate, and high CoV values:

However, it's important to note that the specific thresholds should be tailored to your application, user expectations, and performance goals. What is considered an acceptable or high CoV can vary widely depending on the nature of the software and its criticality. Here are some considerations:

  • Application Type: Different types of applications may have different tolerance levels for variability. For example, a real-time financial trading platform might require a lower CoV threshold compared to a less time-sensitive application.
  • User Expectations: Consider what your users expect in terms of performance. Are they sensitive to variations in response times, or are they more forgiving? Align your CoV thresholds with user expectations.
  • Impact on Business: Assess the potential impact of high CoV values on your business. If variability in response times leads to customer dissatisfaction or lost revenue, you may want stricter CoV thresholds.
  • Test Scenarios: Adjust CoV thresholds based on the specific test scenarios. For example, you might allow for higher variability during stress testing when the system is intentionally pushed to its limits.
  • Regulatory Requirements: If your software is subject to regulatory standards, ensure that your CoV thresholds comply with those requirements.

Conclusion

The Coefficient of Variation is a powerful tool that you should add to your software performance testing, particularly when measuring response times, as an excess of the variability of the response times will directly impact the user experience. By incorporating the CoV into your testing, you can ensure that your software applications deliver consistent and reliable performance, enhancing user satisfaction and trust in your product.

Apache JMeter Software User experience application Stability (learning theory) Testing

Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.

Related

  • The Naming Nuance of Non-Functional Requirements
  • Automated Functional Testing: A Step-by-Step Guide
  • How To Test for Your Software’s Scalability
  • Implementing DDoS With MuleSoft: Demonstration With Apache JMeter

Partner Resources


Comments

ABOUT US

  • About DZone
  • Send feedback
  • Community research
  • Sitemap

ADVERTISE

  • Advertise with DZone

CONTRIBUTE ON DZONE

  • Article Submission Guidelines
  • Become a Contributor
  • Core Program
  • Visit the Writers' Zone

LEGAL

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy

CONTACT US

  • 3343 Perimeter Hill Drive
  • Suite 100
  • Nashville, TN 37211
  • support@dzone.com

Let's be friends: